
27-05-2006, 16:03
|
 |
The Betting Blunderbuss
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1193
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
|
|
|
Limit Vs No Limit
Just wanted to ask opinions on this. I've mainly played NL in my poker playing life to date (on and off shade under a year). Played little bits of limit early on to see what it was like but found it a bit slow and harder to gauge the quality of hands others had.
The reason i ask opinions on the difference now is that i was entering an MTT last night on Mermaid and noticed that there were many less people in than normal. Finally twigged that it was because it was a limit game rather than NL. Spotted this just after registration had closed so cursed quietly and got on with it.
Ended up coming 2nd (of 58) which is the best finish of my limited MTT career.
Might just be my opinion but i thought it was far less to do with any particularly good play on my part as getting some luck with good hands at good times (last 3 hands before final table i got AK, AK, AA).
Not wanting to demean anyone here who plays Limit regularly but is it fair to say that it sides slightly more on cards as it's harder to bluff off or fiercely represent a really good hand when you can only raise a set amount?
|