View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 18-02-2007, 17:47
Swooperman's Avatar
Swooperman Swooperman jest offline
Bold only as a precaution
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8070
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Swooperman has disabled reputation
Re: ICC Cricket World Cup

England

1.MP Vaughan (captain)
2.JM Anderson
3.IR Bell
4.RS Bopara
5.PD Collingwood
6.JWM Dalrymple
7.A Flintoff
8.EC Joyce
9.J Lewis
10.SI Mahmood
11.PA Nixon (wicketkeeper)
12.MS Panesar
13.KP Pietersen
14.LE Plunkett
15.AJ Strauss


Are England realistic contenders ?? They go into the tournament with confidence as high in one dayers as it has been for a few years, after winning the Tri-Series, so undoubtedly that gives them more of a chance than they had before.
The bookies cant decide, perhaps understandable as the majority of them are English & therefore will take patriotic punts on the England team. Some make them 2nd favourites whilst at least one has them 1/3 to be eliminated in the Super-8's.
Personally I think theyre in better shape than they were, but the spirit engendered at the end of the Aussie tour will be dissipated by the returning players. England are a much better side with Pietersen as hes a world class player, but is the atmosphere better with or without him ?? Theyre a much, much better side with Vaughan as captain, but does it weaken the batting ?? And I'm not actually sure where Jon Lewis fits into this squad The 3 mentioned are also carrying injuries, so if I'm criticising Australia & Pakistan for gambling on injured players, England must come into that equation too.

I was suprised Mal Loye didnt make the squad tbh, as although he only came in as a replacement he offered something new. What is the order going to be, as Strauss was dropped to 4 in Australia but with the returning Pietersen & the composition of the squad I can now only see him opening....yet hes had a crap run & this means England will open with him & Vaughan, one dodgy form wise & one not certain to last a match never mind all of them & has a crap ODI record to boot !!

I see the team being picked as this assuming full fitness:

Strauss
Vaughan
Bell
Pietersen
Collingwood
Flintoff
Dalrymple
Nixon
Plunkett
Anderson
Panesar

Personally I'd have to pick Joyce but I cant see them doing it unless Vaughan gets injured & theres no way in the world that he'll play every game. It was Joyce who wandered in after the debacles of 110 & 120 all out vs NZ & Australia & scored a ton, & arguably that got England kicking again, together with Colly hitting form & Australia suddenly falling overboard.
After the 2 openers I think the next 4 are set in stone. Bell didnt set the world alight & needs to score bigger but he didnt have a bad tour considering & there has been signs recently of him batting at a decent one day tempo. I think Dalrymples position is his to lose but its not massively secure & Plunkett & Anderson both had decent one day series's with the ball, although if Andersons unfit & Mahmood plays arguably the batting is strengthened. Panesar has to play IMO to provide good line & length although the smaller caribbean grounds might be a worry.

Confidence can go a long way & England will have that & they shouldnt have too many problems qualifying from the 1st stage, although I repeat they shouldnt take Kenya too lightly.
The whole thing revolves around the 1st game though, as if they dont beat NZ they'll enter the 2nd stage with 0 points which will leave them needing to win 4 from 6 to stand a chance of qualifying. On a good day I can see them beating India although there'd be many who'd disagree with me & then they'd be aiming at Pakistan I suppose. In crunch games I struggle to see them winning any 2 from Australia, SA, SL & WIs at home.
If they can beat NZ in the 1st match then 3 wins from 6 might be enough for the semis & then anything can happen.
From a betting point of view I think the time to back them outright has been & gone & although I think its very open this time around, its hard to see them winning it
Reply With Quote