Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kiko
Yeah i agree.
Also remember the financial backing Villa now have and the lack of financial backing City have at the minute.
|
I was going to work my lunch hour and merely browse
TDP. After seeing this topic though, I feel compelled to spout my usual trademark brand of bile and nonsensical comment on this thread.
First off, Villa arent as 'marketable' as Chelsea. Im not saying Chelsea are a bigger club, but with the players they have and the fact they are in London, Villa and Chelsea are poles apart.
They obviously dont have the financial clout of Chelsea and I would debate kiko's point "remember the financial backing villa now have" as I dont see any backing. They bought Petrov.... and.... errr errr that crap right back that Celtic released, Agather Christie or whatever he's called.
So no real example of financial muscle.
Lets not forget, O'Neill came first in a 2 horse race up in no-man's land. I think people lose perspective on what he achieved. He did well with a good club (relatively speaking), no more no less. You look at what Maureen did (and I hate him) at Porto - 2 finals 2 'lucky' wins, but wins never the less.
O'Neill like I said won what was expected of him, no more. He's an ok manager.
I think Villa will settle down after the hype dies away. I think that the reason they are doing so well, is that other clubs havent kicked on this year. Top six still wouldnt include Villa, I'd go for Liverpool, Chelsea, Man U, Everton, Arsenal, Spurs and even Pompey before Villa. Thats not based on a biased attitude towards the midlands, its based on the fact that no midlands club will achieve anything of note, ever.
Although I have money on them winning the Coca Cola LDV Worthington Cup Anglo Italian vans trophy or whatever the league cup is called these days.